Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb"

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb"
Date: 2009-11-15 21:16:38
Message-ID: 1258319798.14054.3076.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 15:07 +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> extend pg_ctl functionality and add "init" command which do same thing
> like initdb

If we did add an extra option then the option would be "initdb" not
"init". It would take us all years to remove all evidence of the phrase
"initdb" from the mailing lists and our minds.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message BuyAndRead Test 2009-11-15 21:43:54 Config help
Previous Message John R Pierce 2009-11-15 21:11:27 Re: Experience with many schemas vs many databases