| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple |
| Date: | 2012-02-04 18:49:12 |
| Message-ID: | 12579.1328381352@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The cause here is data changing underneath the user. Your patch solves
> the most obvious error, but it still allows other problems if applying
> the backup block changes data. If the backup block doesn't do anything
> at all then we don't need to apply it either.
This is nonsense. What applying the backup block does is to apply the
change that the WAL record would otherwise have applied, except we
decided to make it store a full-page image instead.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bridget Frey | 2012-02-04 19:52:09 | Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-02-04 18:39:19 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-02-04 19:07:05 | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-02-04 18:39:19 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple |