Re: slony issues.

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: slony issues.
Date: 2009-11-07 19:06:16
Message-ID: 1257620776.27737.598.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 11:59 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Thanks I'll take a look. I'm afraid that I might not get much out of
> it if the cost is hidden by the function. But it's a start.

You should be able to get the cost of any SPI executed in the function
by using auto_explain.log_nested_statements. Other activity may be
hidden, but I can't think of something else that a function in slony
would spend a lot of time doing.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Petzold 2009-11-07 20:35:15 pgp encryption functions
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-07 18:59:51 Re: slony issues.