Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> One minor irritation is that the query string of prepared statements
> created via SQL has "PREPARE ... AS" prefixed to it, whereas statements
> prepared via the FE-BE protocol do not. This should probably be fixed,
That's debatable. Earlier today, I was busy being annoyed all over
again with the way that Bruce set up Parse/Bind/Execute logging to
deliberately obscure the difference between a SQL PREPARE command and a
protocol-level Parse operation. I think it's a good thing to be able to
tell which level a prepared statement came from. Yeah, much of the time
you may not care, but when you do care it's important.
regards, tom lane