Re: fdw validation function vs zero catalog id

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fdw validation function vs zero catalog id
Date: 2009-12-20 17:29:16
Message-ID: 1256.1261330156@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It appears that the function for validating generic options to a FDW,
> SERVER and USER MAPPING is always passed a catalog oid of 0. Whereas
> it should actually be passed the oid of the catalog that the options
> apply to.

According to what? I can't find any documentation whatsoever on what
arguments that function is supposed to get.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-20 17:52:32 Re: Removing pg_migrator limitations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-20 16:20:01 Re: alpha3 bundled -- please verify