| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standby on git |
| Date: | 2009-10-02 20:32:45 |
| Message-ID: | 1254515565.4691.47.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 18:04 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I will add code to make a shutdown checkpoint be a valid starting place
> > for Hot Standby, as long as there are no in-doubt prepared transactions.
> > That way we know there are no xids still running and no locks, without
> > needing to write a record to say so.
>
> Ok, I can live with that, and should be dead simple to implement.
First cut changes made, for discussion.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-10-02 21:29:35 | Re: latest hstore patch |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-10-02 20:29:53 | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |