Re: Something smells in this schema...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Something smells in this schema...
Date: 2001-02-16 18:02:24
Message-ID: 12540.982346544@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> writes:
> I had postgres start blocking all it's UPDATEs on a production
> database today, when an engineer added the following two tables,
> among other things. We've had to restore from backup, and the
> interesting thing is that when we re-add these tables, things
> break again.

"blocking"? Please define symptoms more precisely.

> My first thought was the index on the boolean field in the time_cards,
> which I could have sworn has caused me problems before. Anyone else see
> anything wrong?

Pre-7.1 versions do have problems with large numbers of equal keys in
a btree index, which is more or less the definition of an index on
boolean. I'm dubious that such an index is of any value anyway ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Haberlach 2001-02-16 18:14:34 Re: Something smells in this schema...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-16 17:47:26 Re: Quick question about 7.1 & SQL92 Entry Level