From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |
Date: | 2009-09-18 15:43:04 |
Message-ID: | 1253288584.4155.55.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:23 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> >> Is there a reason that you remove the WAL_DEBUG shown below?
>
> > WAL_DEBUG is not removed by the patch, though that section of code is
> > removed, as you observe. I recall an earlier bug report by
> > me/conversation on hackers about how that section of code was
> > irrecoverably broken, since it's calling an rmgr routine while not in
> > recovery and also assuming the data is fully accessible at that point,
> > which it is not.
>
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to remove the rm_desc() call? I agree
> that that's broken, but the rest doesn't seem to be.
That would make sense also. Previous action just because that was
earlier consensus. Will change.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Colish | 2009-09-18 15:53:36 | Re: [PATCH] pgbench: new feature allowing to launch shell commands |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-18 15:25:59 | Re: numeric_to_number() function skipping some digits |