Re: FSM search modes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FSM search modes
Date: 2009-09-18 06:09:15
Message-ID: 1253254155.9666.285.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:47 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > * compact - page selection specifically attempts to find the lowest
> > numbered blocks, so that the table will naturally shrink over time.
>
> We cannot shrink the table if one tuple remains at the end of table
> and the tuple is always HOT-updated, because we put a new tuple into
> the same page where the old tuple is placed if possible.
>
> In addition to your intelligent FSM search modes,
> do we need another algorithm to make the compaction to work better?

Perhaps we can have an additional piece of information about a table.
Something like target_size, so that normal updaters that attempt HOT
updates on blocks greater than target_size would know to avoid that
block and to seek a new location for the row lower in the table. Perhaps
such information could be reset and then sent via invalidation
mechanisms.

I'm thinking along the lines of a "fire alarm". An occasional mechanism
by which we can inform users of the need to evacuate certain blocks.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2009-09-18 06:10:14 Re: [PATCH] pgbench: new feature allowing to launch shell commands
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-09-18 05:50:06 Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09