From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
Cc: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
Date: | 2001-11-15 16:01:07 |
Message-ID: | 12532.1005840067@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
/* Plain "long int" fits, use it */
+ #if SIZEOF_INT8 == 0
typedef long int int64;
+ #endif
+ #if SIZEOF_UINT8 == 0
typedef unsigned long int uint64;
+ #endif
This coding appears to assume "if the platform defines int8, then
it will define int64 as well". Seems mighty fragile to me.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-15 16:07:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
Previous Message | Roland Roberts | 2001-11-15 15:57:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Interchange |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-15 16:07:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
Previous Message | Roland Roberts | 2001-11-15 15:57:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Interchange |