Re: [BUG] Logical replica crash if there was an error in a function.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replica crash if there was an error in a function.
Date: 2023-04-03 18:49:17
Message-ID: 1252516.1680547757@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Anton A. Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru> writes:
> Now there are no any pending questions, so moved it to RFC.

I did not think this case was worth memorializing in a test before,
and I still do not. I'm inclined to reject this patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2023-04-03 18:49:35 Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-04-03 18:43:14 Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often