From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: remove flatfiles.c |
Date: | 2009-09-02 18:07:04 |
Message-ID: | 1251914824.8406.41.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:01 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Greg,
>
> > I don't think we want to cluster on the primary key. I think we just
> > want to rewrite the table keeping the same physical ordering.
>
> Agreed.
Are we sure about that? I would argue that the majority of users out
their (think Django and other Web*Frameworks) are all searching
primarily by primary key + other anyway.
We could always offer the ability to vacuum full (cluster) on index foo
but default to the primary key.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-02 18:14:08 | Re: Linux LSB init script |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-09-02 18:01:02 | Re: remove flatfiles.c |