From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add YAML option to explain |
Date: | 2009-08-28 21:26:48 |
Message-ID: | 1251494808.27122.58.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:23 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 8/28/09 1:13 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> >
> >> I thought the consensus was that we didn't want to get into supporting
> >> more formats. What does YAML provide that JSON does not?
> >
> > Readability and easy editing. All the power of JSON without the
> > annoying quotes, braces, and brackets.
>
> How many lines of code does YAML support add to the codebase?
>
> While I personally like YAML, it's not like it has broad industry
> support. And people wouldn't interface with the XML or JSON directly;
> they'd use a library for that. That's the whole point of having those
> outputs.
I am not keen on having YAML support.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-28 21:34:17 | Re: Add YAML option to explain |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-08-28 21:23:43 | Re: Add YAML option to explain |