Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> I am not sure to get the concerns of upthread regarding the type
> caching in the context of an aggregate, which is the business with
> lookup_type_cache(), especially since there is a btree operator
> relying on record_cmp(). Tom, what were your concerns here?
Don't recall right at this instant, but I've put myself down as
reviewer of this patch to remind me to look at it in the next
day or two.
regards, tom lane