Re: Worse performance with higher work_mem?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Israel Brewster <ijbrewster(at)alaska(dot)edu>
Cc: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Worse performance with higher work_mem?
Date: 2020-01-14 17:54:09
Message-ID: 12501.1579024449@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Israel Brewster <ijbrewster(at)alaska(dot)edu> writes:
> On Jan 13, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don’t see that you’ve updated the statistics?

> Ummmm….no. I know nothing about that :-)

Just do a manual ANALYZE on the table, if you don't want to wait
around for autovacuum to get to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Lewis 2020-01-14 19:48:55 Re: Multiple Aggregations Order
Previous Message Justin 2020-01-14 17:32:00 Re: Worse performance with higher work_mem?