From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Date: | 2009-01-25 14:22:38 |
Message-ID: | 124B9DE0574ABD49719C87F2@amenophis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On 24. Januar 2009 20:47:20 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
>> What i'm missing is some notion about CHECK OPTION. We
>> surely want to support that in way.
>
> Feel free to insist on that, if you want to make dead certain that
> updatable views don't make it into 8.4 ;-)
Of course, i'm the last one insisting on that ;)
Understand this as my noisy thinking how a possible *future* implementation
would fit in that syntax proposal. It would be bad if we recognize some day
that this was a bad decision. But on further thinking it doesn't make sense
here anyways, so back to the real problems.
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-25 14:23:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-25 14:02:37 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |