| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Duplicate Events (and other stuff).. |
| Date: | 2009-08-10 20:02:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1249934562.7494.187.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 20:11 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 19:50 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> I would say no to forks, but yes to alternate distros.
> >
> > Where does Mammoth fall as it is Open Source?
>
> Is it a fork, or an add-on like Slony? If the latter, I'd say yes, it
> should be included as it's clearly centered around 'pure' PostgreSQL.
> If the former, then, well, no.
Well I guess it depends on how you look at it. Mammoth is pure
PostgreSQL with Replication added in (meaning the only thing we add is
replication).
>
> I'm just one opinion though - others (including you) may disagree.
>
I have never been known to keep my opinion to myself :P. I was more
looking at it from the Open Source / Not Open Source perspective.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-08-10 20:06:04 | Re: Duplicate Events (and other stuff).. |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-08-10 19:47:36 | Re: Duplicate Events (and other stuff).. |