| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing |
| Date: | 2006-11-05 21:44:43 |
| Message-ID: | 12490.1162763083@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 14:47 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> That way it's unambiguous which is which. Ie, that it's minimum and maximum
>> age and not minimum and maximum transaction id which would be the other way
>> around.
> Sounds logical. Hadn't seen that you could take it both ways.
Agreed --- I've adopted Greg's suggestion.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 22:03:48 | Re: Writing WAL for relcache invalidation:pg_internal.init |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 21:39:25 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 22:03:48 | Re: Writing WAL for relcache invalidation:pg_internal.init |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 21:39:25 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing |