From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: revised hstore patch |
Date: | 2009-07-22 00:19:02 |
Message-ID: | 1248221942.3840.6.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 01:06 +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> I'm prepared to give slightly more consideration to option #3: make
> the new code read the old format as well as the new one. I believe
> (though I have not yet tested) that it is possible to reliably
> distinguish the two with relatively low overhead, though the overhead
> would be nonzero, and do an in-core format conversion (which would
> result in writing out the new format if anything changed).
It might be good to have a way to ensure that all values have been
upgraded to the new format. Otherwise you have to permanently maintain
the old format even across multiple upgrades. Maybe that's not a big
deal, but I thought I'd bring it up.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-22 00:29:48 | Re: Patch for contains/overlap of polygons |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-22 00:13:02 | Re: revised hstore patch |