Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: memory leak occur when disconnect database

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: tanjunhua <tanjh(at)riso(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: memory leak occur when disconnect database
Date: 2009-07-21 14:34:24
Message-ID: 1248186864.894.125.camel@ayaki
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 10:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I'm a bit puzzled about why you have three "postmaster" instances shown
> > as running.
>
> It's not unusual for "top" to show the postmaster's child processes as
> "postmaster" as well. Depends on the platform and the options given
> to top.

Ah. Thanks for clearing that one up. That'd make more sense, since it'd
mean the postmaster, bgwriter, and whichever of the stats collector/wal
writer exist in 8.1 were running.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2009-07-21 14:47:30 Re: element from an array by its index
Previous Message bricklen 2009-07-21 14:33:46 Re: commercial adaptation of postgres