From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: suggestion: log_statement = sample |
Date: | 2009-07-20 17:28:53 |
Message-ID: | 1248110933.32370.12.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 13:24 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: RIPEMD160
> >
> >
> > >> In my experience, I've found that enabling full logging for a short time
> > >> (perhaps a few hours) gathers enough data to run through tools like
> > >> pgFouine and find problem areas.
> >
> > > It is not possible for us. Logging millions of statements take too much time.
>
> This is a ridiculous statement.
No it isn't.
> In actual practice, full query logging
> is 1/50 the amount of disk I/O as the actual database activity. If your
> systems are so stressed that they can't handle another 2% increase, then
> you've got bigger problems lurking.
It depends on the system. I have seen even big systems take a huge hit
by full logging due to transactional velocity.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2009-07-20 17:37:15 | Re: suggestion: log_statement = sample |
Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2009-07-20 17:24:13 | Re: suggestion: log_statement = sample |