From: | <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is seq search preferred here by planner? |
Date: | 2003-04-23 17:12:26 |
Message-ID: | 1248.219.65.233.8.1051117946.squirrel@mail.trade-india.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> Mallah,
>
>> UPDATE email_bank set country=personal_account_details.country where userid
>> > 0 and userid=personal_account_details.userid ;
>
> While Postgres is letting you "fudge", you are missing part of that SQL statement. It should
> be:
>
> UPDATE email_bank set country=personal_account_details.country
> FROM personal_account_details
> where userid > 0 and userid=personal_account_details.userid ;
yes this is the proper SQL , but that also works and have same results.
>
>> tradein_clients=# begin work;explain analyze UPDATE email_bank set
>> country=personal_account_details.country where userid > 0 and
>> userid=personal_account_details.userid ;BEGIN
>> Time: 669.57 ms
>
> Hmmm ... 669 ms seems pretty speedy for updating 150,000 rows. What's the problem?
Hmm i am not running postgresql on a CRAY :-)
that was the time for "begin work;" since
i am explain analysing an update i am putting it in transaction.
the actualt time was nearing 300 secs which is 5 mins
i did an explain of the UPDATE FROM variant of the query it has the same
plan for it.
regds
mallah.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
-----------------------------------------
Get your free web based email at trade-india.com.
"India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.!"
http://www.trade-india.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-23 17:21:38 | Re: Why is seq search preferred here by planner? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-23 17:00:20 | Re: Why is seq search preferred here by planner? |