From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Predicate migration on complex self joins |
Date: | 2009-07-13 18:06:40 |
Message-ID: | 1247508400.11347.1132.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > In some cases, we have SQL being submitted that has superfluous
> > self-joins. An example would be
>
> > select count(*)
> > from foo1 a, foo1 b
> > where a.c1 = b.c1 /* PK join */
> > and a.c2 = 5
> > and b.c2 = 10;
>
> > You may well ask who would be stupid enough to write SQL like that. The
> > answer is of course that it is automatically generated by an ORM.
>
> Seems like the right answer is "fix the damn ORM". It's hard to believe
> this sort of case comes up often enough to justify the cycles that would
> be expended (on *every* join query) to try to recognize it.
Yeh, damn ORMs seem to spring up faster than vines.
Not just because of this but I wonder if we might benefit from an
optimizer setting specifically aimed at the foolishnesses of
automatically generated SQL.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-13 18:33:41 | Re: Predicate migration on complex self joins |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-13 18:04:57 | Re: Index-only scans |