From: | "Edgars Diebelis" <edgars(dot)diebelis(at)divi(dot)lv> |
---|---|
To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
Date: | 2005-01-20 15:24:37 |
Message-ID: | 124701c4ff04$2b21bd40$805d553e@divi.lv |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I have no experience with pgCluster, but I found:
PGCluster is a multi-master and synchronous replication system that
supports load balancing of PostgreSQL.
http://www.software-facilities.com/databases-software/pgcluster.php
May be some have some expierience with this tool?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Hervé Piedvache" <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>
Cc: "Jeff" <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>; <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:58 PM
Subject: [spam] Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
>>>Or you could fork over hundreds of thousands of dollars for Oracle's
>>>RAC.
>>
>>
>> No please do not talk about this again ... I'm looking about a PostgreSQL
>> solution ... I know RAC ... and I'm not able to pay for a RAC certify
>> hardware configuration plus a RAC Licence.
>
> There is absolutely zero PostgreSQL solution...
>
> You may have to split the data yourself onto two independent db servers
> and combine the results somehow in your application.
>
> Chris
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2005-01-20 15:26:37 | Re: index scan of whole table, can't see why |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-01-20 15:23:34 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |