Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Date: 2009-07-06 15:57:52
Message-ID: 1246895872.28986.36.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:30 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > It would be useful to see a real example of what this can be used
> > for.
>
> Constraints like "these intervals can't overlap" would be one. It's
> handy in calendaring applications, for example.

Exactly, you already know my use case ;) My goal is a "temporal key",
where you can't have overlapping intervals of time, e.g. the constraint
"nobody can be two places at the same time".

> > I think it will be useful to separate the concepts of a constraint
> > from the concept of an index. It seems possible to have a UNIQUE
> > constraint that doesn't help at all in locating rows, just in
> > proving that the rows are unique.
>
> Interesting idea. Are you thinking of this in terms of things the
> planner can do once it knows a set is all distinct values, or...?

I think that's an orthogonal idea.

It's a good idea though, I would like the planner to be smarter about
those kinds of things. A simple example is that if a table has a
non-partial unique constraint anywhere, then "select * from foo union
select * from foo" can be transformed into "select * from
foo" (eliminating the expensive union).

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-07-06 16:02:27 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-07-06 15:50:17 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints