| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
| Date: | 2009-07-02 19:34:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1246563269.1364.14.camel@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 13:13 -0400:
> I wrote:
> > Yes. What I was thinking of doing was committing a configure change to
> > reject flex < 2.5.31, and waiting to see how much of the buildfarm goes
> > red.
>
> Actually, most of the buildfarm members show which flex version they are
> running in the configure output. A quick look shows that of the 45
> members that have reported on HEAD in the past 2 days, 22 are running
> 2.5.4, which is a lot higher than I was expecting. Most of these are
> the Solaris boxen, which I imagine can be updated fairly painlessly
> since there are some of them that are already running something newer.
I hope, need to check/compile, but I don't expect any problems.
Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-02 19:35:13 | Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation |
| Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2009-07-02 19:28:56 | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |