Re: 8.5 development schedule

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Date: 2009-06-30 16:30:57
Message-ID: 1246379457.20569.11.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 12:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'm also not prepared to push a large and unstable feature into the tree
> on the hope that it will get fixed. The general consensus among -core,
> and I think most of -hackers as well, is that we want to try to keep CVS
> HEAD pretty stable, so that developers aren't fighting each others'
> bugs. This also ties into the "alpha releases" concept that Peter
> mentioned --- if HEAD isn't stable then we can hardly put out a testable
> alpha release.

+1

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-06-30 16:32:51 Re: 8.5 development schedule
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-30 16:29:56 Re: 8.5 development schedule