Re: Is it wise to include table inheritence in the tutorial?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: martin(at)arp242(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it wise to include table inheritence in the tutorial?
Date: 2019-08-05 14:17:40
Message-ID: 12462.1565014660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I was reading the tutorial here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/tutorial-inheritance.html
> But on the "don't do this" Wiki, it is strongly advised not to use this:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Don't_Do_This#Don.27t_use_table_inheritance

That wiki entry is just some random person's opinion, it's not
project policy.

Having said that, the partitioning feature is approaching the
point of being mature enough to recommend to novices, so maybe
we should start thinking about adjusting the tutorial with that
in mind. I wouldn't necessarily remove the inheritance section;
it's talking about OOP-style inheritance, which you can't get
with partitioning.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2019-08-05 20:20:14 Re: Is it wise to include table inheritence in the tutorial?
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2019-08-04 22:14:24 Is it wise to include table inheritence in the tutorial?