Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alan Li <ali(at)truviso(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Date: 2009-06-23 06:20:56
Message-ID: 1245738056.31430.172.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 15:18 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>
> default postgresql.conf (comments stripped)
> max_connections = 100
> shared_buffers = 32MB

This forces ring size to be 4MB, since min(32MB/8, ringsize).

Please re-run tests with your config, ring size 4MB, which should give
same answer

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-06-23 06:41:22 Re: Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender
Previous Message Rajdeep Das 2009-06-23 06:11:22 PK not being restored