From: | Iñigo Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Log full with gigabyes of CurTransactionContex |
Date: | 2009-06-15 15:51:33 |
Message-ID: | 1245081093.16064.66.camel@coyote |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hmmm... OK.
In parallel we have changed the procedure in order to process insert
queries in smaller chunks. In our preproduction environment has solved
the problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Iñigo Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Log full with gigabyes of CurTransactionContex
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:23:45 -0400
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?I=F1igo?= Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com> writes:
> We have increased shared buffers to 2.5GB (linux kernels allows us reach
> this level) and lowered work_mem to 500MB.
You are apparently unclear on the concept. Pushing the database to the
limit of the available address space is probably going to result in
failures. Redistributing a set of overoptimistic parameters into a
different set of overoptimistic parameters will not fix this.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-06-15 17:27:30 | Re: partition insert performance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-15 15:23:45 | Re: Log full with gigabyes of CurTransactionContex |