Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql
Date: 2000-02-01 03:14:38
Message-ID: 12450.949374878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> OK, an overdue comment: the new psql is great (current and future
> discrepencies excepted of course ;)

Agreed. Peter, you've done a really nice job. We're just holding
you to the standards you've proven yourself capable of meeting ;-)

Seriously, it seems like the culture on this list is mostly that
you can expect to hear about it when you break something, but if
you did good you will know it because no one complains...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-01 03:17:37 Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-01 03:12:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql