From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f |
Date: | 2009-06-02 13:41:00 |
Message-ID: | 1243950060.23910.58.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 20:30 -0700, Ron Mayer wrote:
> What I'd find strange about "6.67 rows" in your example is more that on
> the estimated rows side, it seems to imply an unrealistically precise estimate
> in the same way that "667 rows" would seem unrealistically precise to me.
> Maybe rounding to 2 significant digits would reduce confusion?
You're right that the number of significant digits already exceeds the
true accuracy of the computation. I think what Robert wants to see is
the exact value used in the calc, so the estimates can be checked more
thoroughly than is currently possible.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-06-02 13:44:20 | Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-02 13:40:33 | Re: 8.4b2 tsearch2 strange error |