From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Date: | 2009-05-28 13:38:38 |
Message-ID: | 1243517918.24860.563.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 12:08 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ideally someone would have
> taken ownership of the issue, summarized the email conclusions, gotten
> a patch together, and submitted it for application.
Just a further comment on this, based upon the patch Heikki recently
committed.
I raised various issues with recovery *after* feature freeze in 8.3,
doing everything you mentioned above: patch (Jun '07), 4 months before
beta1. 3.5 months later the patch was still un-reviewed and you deferred
the patch until 8.4, without comment (Sep '07). Changes were eventually
committed more than a year after original discussion (Apr '08).
HACKERS "Minor changes to recovery related code"
My other comments relate to that experience, and others.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-05-28 13:49:32 | Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-05-28 13:29:27 | Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby |