| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Konstantin Izmailov <kizmailov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: question about SSIS |
| Date: | 2009-05-22 20:14:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1243023278.16418.886.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 15:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think what he's asking for is the ability for a line in the server to
> > allow multiple authentication methods, and then for the client to be
> > able to specify which one of these it uses.
>
> There's no way we could implement that without a protocol change,
> and it doesn't seem worth it to me. The idea that the client gets
> to choose seems like a bad idea from a security standpoint anyhow...
Wouldn't this be solved just by having fall through authentication?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-05-22 20:36:07 | Re: Aggregate Function to return most common value for a column |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-05-22 19:56:26 | Re: I can't drop a user if I don't drop his grants beforehand?????????????????? |