Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date: 2009-05-12 14:34:10
Message-ID: 1242138850.3843.259.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 14:38 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 14:15 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >
> >> Here's another idea: Let's modify xlog.c so that when the server asks
> >> for WAL file X, and restore_command returns "not found", the server
> >> will not ask for any WAL files >= X again (in that recovery session).
> >> Presumably if X doesn't exist, no later files will exist either.
> >
> > That was proposed and rejected earlier, though not in this context.
>
> Got a link? I'd like to check the past discussion.

I'm sorry, I don't. One of the recovery related discussions started by
me.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-12 14:58:12 Re: Show method of index
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-05-12 13:27:22 Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities)