Re: pg_sorttemp files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_sorttemp files
Date: 2001-10-19 14:09:26
Message-ID: 12418.1003500566@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:
>> BTW, if you are seeing unreclaimed sorttemp files in a recent release
>> (7.0 or later), I'd like to know about it. That shouldn't happen,
>> short of a backend crash anyway...

> Well, I had over 6,000 of these files. This database is about a year old.
> I haven't seen all that many backend crashes in that time. I guess I better
> keep a close eye on them.

Wow! Did you happen to note how many distinct PIDs were accounted for?
That would give us some idea of how many lossage events there were.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-10-19 14:21:39 Re: Does "postmaster -i"...
Previous Message None 2001-10-19 12:54:15 Re: Is there no "DESCRIBE <TABLE>;" on PGSQL? help!!!