Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps
Date: 2009-05-06 20:23:56
Message-ID: 1241641436.4278.94.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 16:10 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> > Isn't that why we wouldn't remove it from back releases?
> >
> >
>
> My clients aren't going to be very happy if they can't upgrade because
> of this.

Certainly. Nobody wants to make clients unhappy but for the good of the
code man, for the good of the code :). 8.3 will be supported for a very
long time to come.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-06 20:27:18 Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-05-06 20:10:48 Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps