Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: 2003-03-14 00:11:23
Message-ID: 12415.1047600683@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Hmm as for PREPAREd statements, it seems much better to
> implement functions which returns fields info for the
> statement than relying on such a protocol level change.

Well, we're changing the protocol anyway for other purposes, so the
extra burden of a change here doesn't seem large. I think it's more
useful to worry about what functionality we want than to worry about
whether it's changed...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2003-03-14 00:31:04 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Greg Stark 2003-03-14 00:06:44 Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2003-03-14 00:31:04 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-03-13 23:58:01 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign