| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Lester <andy(at)petdance(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |
| Date: | 2009-05-01 20:00:28 |
| Message-ID: | 1241208028.10434.18.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 14:44 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> On May 1, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Regardless, I
> > agree with Tom that the idea of having decorators of any kind in
> > source
> > or docs is a bad idea.
>
> Why is it a bad idea? I don't understand the downside of a line or
> two at the bottom of a source file.
Maintenance mostly. Of course we could script that but do you really
want decorators for every editor in there that people use? We have a
huge contingent of VI/Emacs not to mention Joe, Nano, Eclipse, TextMate
etc...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Lester | 2009-05-01 20:02:36 | Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-01 20:00:09 | Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |