From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Buildfarm alarms |
Date: | 2006-09-24 02:12:48 |
Message-ID: | 1241.24.211.165.134.1159063968.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
> I'm just investigating a problem with beta 1 running on Windows 2K and
> XP, and noticed that neither Snake or Bandicoot have built -HEAD for
> nearly 3 weeks. I'm investigating why and will fix the problem, but it
> strikes me that what would be useful is an alarm email from the server
> to note that a run hasn't been reported for a while would have helped
> spot this earlier. This could be configured with an admin-specified
> maximum number of days between reports to allow for those machines that
> connect far less frequently.
>
> Does that sound feasible to you?
>
>
It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally taken the view
that owners have the responsibility for monitoring their own machines.
I'll think about it some more.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-24 02:24:25 | Re: Buildfarm alarms |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-09-23 20:12:29 | Buildfarm alarms |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-24 02:24:25 | Re: Buildfarm alarms |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-09-24 02:12:10 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 Now Available |