Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp releases notes for 8.2.3, 8.1.8, 8.0.12.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp releases notes for 8.2.3, 8.1.8, 8.0.12.
Date: 2007-02-07 23:19:54
Message-ID: 12400.1170890394@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> If it fixes a real, non-theoretical bug and has been backpatched to a
> stable release branch, I would say in most cases it is worth documenting
> in the release notes. Describing every change made in a new feature
> release (i.e. 8.3.0) would be far too much verbiage, but far fewer
> changes are made to stable branches. Also, documenting all the
> significant changes in stable branch releases is valuable to let users
> identify possible regressions.

Neil has a good point: the documentation policy should be different for
updates to stable branches than it is for a new major release. I think
Bruce's "too small to bother with" policy is about right for major
releases, but if we've bothered to back-patch something then it's
usually worth documenting.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-07 23:22:38 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp releases notes for 8.2.3, 8.1.8, 8.0.12.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-07 23:11:30 pgsql: Add a function pg_stat_clear_snapshot() that discards any

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-07 23:22:38 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp releases notes for 8.2.3, 8.1.8, 8.0.12.
Previous Message Neil Conway 2007-02-07 22:37:44 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp releases notes for 8.2.3, 8.1.8, 8.0.12.