From: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Yet another fast GiST build |
Date: | 2020-09-11 06:02:06 |
Message-ID: | 123F5F32-9A85-4D0B-9C7A-1686E6BBE15D@yandex-team.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 10 сент. 2020 г., в 17:43, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> написал(а):
>
> One more patch version attached. I fixed some memory leaks, and fixed the abbreviation on 32-bit systems, and a bunch of small comment changes and such.
>
> - Heikki
> <v18-0001-Add-support-for-building-GiST-index-by-sorting.patch>
The patch looks fine to me. On my machine GiST for points is builded 10x faster than before the patch.
Future action items:
1. Sort support for gist_btree data types
2. Better page borders with split and fillfactor
3. Consider sort build for tsvector
I'll certainly do 1 before next CF and most probably 2.
Item 1 is basically a lot of similar code for many many different types.
In Item 2 I plan to use Oleg's gevel to evaluation possibilities of MBR overlap reduction.
Item 3 seems tricky and need deeper evaluation: chances are sort build will decrease IndexScan performance in this case.
Thanks, Heikki!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2020-09-11 06:42:34 | Corner-case bug in pg_rewind |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-09-11 05:48:03 | Re: Optimising compactify_tuples() |