Re: Strange behaviour with a query

From: Iñigo Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour with a query
Date: 2009-04-17 12:00:45
Message-ID: 1239969645.3721.30.camel@coyote
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Wow... thank you very much, Scott.

SELECT pg_stat_reset();
ANALYZE;
And everything working like a charm....

What is the reason for this to happen? Is it common?

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Iñigo Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaume Sabater
<jsabater(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergio Chavarria <sergio(dot)chavarria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Strange behaviour with a query
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:30:19 -0600

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Iñigo Martinez Lasala
>> <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hi everybody again.
>>>
>>> Deleting rel_dis_can_fk index has solved the problem! But.... why??
>>
>> Hard to say without explain analyze output.
>>
>
> I'd hazard a guess that you're getting a lot more rows back from the
> bitmap scan of rel_dis_can_fk than the query planner expects. But
> that's just a guess.

Try craniking up your default stats setting and running analyze again
and seeing if it runs fast even with the index.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-17 14:37:18 Re: Strange behaviour with a query
Previous Message Iñigo Martinez Lasala 2009-04-17 11:58:35 Re: Strange behaviour with a query