Re: Concurrent connections in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Concurrent connections in psql
Date: 2007-03-28 00:54:17
Message-ID: 12394.1175043257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I would love, love, love to be able to use this syntax within pg_dump as
> well, so we can create multiple indexes in parallel at restore time.

I can hardly conceive of greater folly than putting an *experimental*
psql facility into pg_dump scripts, thereby forcing us to support it
until the end of time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-28 01:15:25 Patch queue concern
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-03-28 00:49:42 Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers