From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: initdb in C |
Date: | 2003-11-08 17:18:20 |
Message-ID: | 12393.1068311900@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Consider also the strong likelihood that the data directory's parent
>> directory is owned by root,
> Again, this directory recreate happens only on Win32, an I thought it
> would be OK there.
Windows has no concept of directory permissions at all? I thought the
more recent versions had at least rudimentary permissions.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-08 17:27:57 | Re: initdb in C |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-08 17:13:52 | Re: New approach to ye olde cross-datatype indexing problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-08 17:27:57 | Re: initdb in C |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-08 17:10:23 | Re: initdb in C |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-08 17:27:57 | Re: initdb in C |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-08 17:10:23 | Re: initdb in C |