From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces |
Date: | 2004-03-03 14:30:53 |
Message-ID: | 12388.1078324253@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
>>> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
>>> symlinks.
> To create symlinked directories on Win2k NTFS see:
> http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.shtml#junction
> I think Win2000 or XP would be a reasonable restriction for Win32 PG
> installations that want tablespaces.
Oh, good --- symlinks for directories are all that we need for this
design. I think that settles it then.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-03 14:36:53 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-03-03 14:10:40 | Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-03 14:36:53 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-03-03 13:46:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces |