| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, alexk <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table |
| Date: | 2011-06-09 18:45:31 |
| Message-ID: | 12386.1307645131@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi jun 08 14:28:02 -0400 2011:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> This customer is running on 8.4 so I started from there; should I
>>> backpatch this to 8.2, or not at all?
>> I'm not excited about back-patching it...
> Bummer.
Well, of course mine is only one opinion; anybody else feel this *is*
worth risking a back-patch for?
My thought is that it needs some beta testing. Perhaps it'd be sane to
push it into beta2 now, and then back-patch sometime after 9.1 final,
if no problems pop up.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-09 18:49:23 | Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table |
| Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2011-06-09 18:00:19 | Re: postgres server on windows with high availability and failover safe |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-09 18:49:23 | Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-06-09 18:40:25 | Re: could not truncate directory "pg_serial": apparent wraparound |