Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Date: 2024-07-24 15:43:43
Message-ID: 1238410.1721835823@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I merged these changes, made a few other cosmetic changes, and pushed the patch.

There is a CF entry pointing at this thread [1]. Should it be closed?

regards, tom lane

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4867/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Schneider 2024-07-24 15:44:42 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-07-24 15:39:56 Re: Support prepared statement invalidation when result types change