From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Date: | 2009-03-27 13:09:24 |
Message-ID: | 1238159364.16568.600.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:19 +0100, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>
> >> If we go with this, I would suggest we make *neither* the default by
> >> removing -t, and adopting two new options: something like -f == fast
> >> failover, -p == patient failover.
> >
> > -m smart|fast|immediate :-)
>
> The advantage of having 2 options (or the ability to put a string
> value in the trigger file) is that you can choose the behaviour when
> you need to trigger it (you just have to use the 2 options with 2
> different filenames). I don't think it's the case with your proposal.
Yes, sorry. I meant we should use the naming Peter suggests.
So we would have two triggers, but call them fast and smart, rather than
fast and patient.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2009-03-27 13:37:00 | Re: psql: Make tab completion work for ANALYZE VERBOSE ... |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2009-03-27 13:04:06 | Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data |