Re: Ignore -- testing message-id on footer

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ignore -- testing message-id on footer
Date: 2009-03-17 16:43:35
Message-ID: 1237308215.8159.30.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:37 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> > > <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > >> This email on the web: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/$MESSAGE_ID
> >
> > > fail :)
> >
> > It's a bad idea anyway.
>
> I find it useless, but why do you think it's a bad idea?

I would certainly like to have some idea behind why making accessing
specific threads in the archives is a bad idea?

> I had a look
> at the mj2 source and I think the patch needed to make this work is a
> one liner. So if we're interested it seems that it could be made to
> work.
>

Cool.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-03-17 16:50:05 Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-17 16:37:32 Re: Ignore -- testing message-id on footer